Analysis on Nozick's Entitlement Theory and My Argument Regarding It
- 최초 등록일
- 2020.10.17
- 최종 저작일
- 2020.07
- 5페이지/
MS 워드
- 가격 2,000원
![할인쿠폰받기](/images/v4/document/ico_det_coupon.gif)
소개글
"Analysis on Nozick's Entitlement Theory and My Argument Regarding It"에 대한 내용입니다.
[Freshmen Writing] / A0
목차
1. Summary of Nozick’s Argument
2. Statement: The Legitimacy of Redistribution
3. Regarding The Original Acquisition of holdings
4. Regarding the Transfer of Holdings in Chamberlain Analogy
5. Regarding the Intrusion of Individual Rights
본문내용
Summary of Nozick’s Argument
According to Nozick, patterned distribution of certain natural dimension is not justifiable in terms of liberty and voluntary choice. He asserts his idea of Entitlement Theory regarding (1) the original acquisition of holdings (2) the transfer of holdings and (3) the rectification of injustice in holding – as a just form of distribution.
To unfold his logic, he uses the persuasive analogy of Wilt Chamberlain. It supposes the distribution of one’s favorite natural dimension as D1, then displays the situation of Wilt Chamberlain earning 250,000 dollars a year from the 25-cent priced ticket of one million people.
참고 자료
없음