The Prohibition of Euthanasia 안락사 반대 에세이 (영문)
- 최초 등록일
- 2011.08.21
- 최종 저작일
- 2011.07
- 8페이지/
MS 워드
- 가격 15,000원
소개글
안락사 반대 에세이이고 A받았습니다. 문법 틀린거 없고 (문법 체크 네이티브한테 받았어요) 대학교 수준에서 a받으실수있는 에세이에요. 논리를 요하는 과목이라서 오류가 없어야 되고 자기 주장을 잘 support해야 되는 글이라 쓰는데 시간이 좀걸렸구요. kant철학도 반영했습니다
MLA 스타일로 작성되었습니다
목차
없음
본문내용
The Prohibition of Euthanasia
The legalization of euthanasia is controversial because it is related to human life. Advocates of euthanasia argue that quality of life is the most essential element and killing can be justified in case death is benefit for the one killed. (Singer 214). There are several reasons as to why euthanasia is ethically problematic, however. In this paper, I argue that we should not legalize euthanasia because of unjustified euthanasia condition and the serious influence to the various people and the society.
Firstly, we should not legalize euthanasia because euthanasia condition is not justified. Patients in extreme physical distress are of unsound psychological status; thus, they may change their mind. Peter Singer argues that “euthanasia can be voluntary if the person expresses the wish to die at the moment of distress or when the person makes a written request for euthanasia when he is in good health. In killing a person who has made such a request, who has re-affirmed it from time to time, one could truly claim to be acting with her consent.” (Singer 176). However, it is questionable that the request for death is a sincere or reliable response, since they may not be of sound mind at the time of his or her decision.
참고 자료
Judith, Boss. Think: Critical thinking and logical skills for everyday life. New York: McGraw
Hill, 2010.
Singer, Peter. Taking Life: Human. Cambridge, 1993
Somerville, Margaret. Deathbed disputation: a response to Peter Singer. Montreal: McGill
Queen’s University Press, 2002
