‘Foreign Elements’ in the Arbitration of China’s Free Trade Zones
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 이준국제법연구원
ㆍ수록지정보 : China and WTO Review / 5권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : Xia Tang
ㆍ저자명 : Xia Tang
목차
I. IntroductionII. Legislative Theory of“Concerning Foreign Affairs” in China’sCivil and Commercial Relations
III. Determination of the “Foreign-relatedNature” of the Arbitration CasesInvolving the Free Trade Zones
A. The Scope of the Subject
B. Fulfilling the Expansion of Object Content
C. Extending the Time of Legal Facts
IV. Restrictions on Ascertaining‘Foreign-related’ Factors in ArbitrationCases Involving Foreign Trade Zones
A. Identifying Parties’ “False Foreign-related” Contracts
B. The Foreign related Civil and Commercial Relations Must Havea Substantive Connection with Foreign Countries
C. The Judge’s Exercise of Discretion Should Be Justified
V. Conclusion
References
영어 초록
Since the traditional definition of ‘foreign elements’ cannot meet the new requirements of the arbitration of China’s FTZs, Chinese judicial practice must create a useful supplement to already established standards. In free trade zone arbitration cases, Chinese courts determine foreign elements based on the standards of subject, object, and legal facts. In this regard, the explanation for ‘other circumstances’ in the First Judicial Interpretation of the Supreme Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law of the PRC on Foreign-Related Relations is based on the three abovementioned elements. The Chinese arbitration system and legislation must be further perfected; however, overly broad standards may impede China’s domestic arbitration system. Moreover, China must add certain restrictions to the standards: judges should distinguish the artificial foreign elements created by contracting parties, controversial civil relations should have a material connection with foreign countries, and discretion should be reasonable with sufficient nucleus.참고 자료
없음"China and WTO Review"의 다른 논문
- Human Rights Education in the Chinese Context24페이지
- Necessity or Luxury? Sober Second Thoughts on the Chine..32페이지
- Establishment of a Belt and Road Dispute Settlement Mec..22페이지
- China’s Practice in Vessel Tonnage Tax Collection: Legi..20페이지
- Digitalization of Trade in Free Trade Agreements with R..18페이지
- Crimes Committed by Legal Persons: A Comparative Sino-G..18페이지
- Statutory Safeguards and Privileges for Developing Coun..16페이지
- Pending Section 232 Litigation and Broader Trade Trends..12페이지
- Is Huawei a Leverage of the US-China Trade War? A Criti..8페이지
- The Forum on China-Africa Cooperation: An Investment Pe..12페이지