Transboundary Haze Pollution in Southeast Asia: The Effectiveness of Three Forms of International Legal Solutions
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 이준국제법연구원
ㆍ수록지정보 : Journal of East Asia and International Law / 10권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : Kexian Ng
ㆍ저자명 : Kexian Ng
목차
I. IntroductionII. The Sources of International Law againstthe Haze of Indonesia
A. Customary International Law
B. Multilateral Instruments
C. Singapore’s Extraterritorial Legislation
III. What Has Been Done by Indonesia?
IV. Measuring Effectiveness of the ASEANAgreement and the Singapore Act
A. Measuring Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements
B. Measuring Effectiveness of the ASEAN Agreement
C. Measuring Effectiveness of the Singapore Act
D. Analysing the Role of Third Parties
V. Conclusion
영어 초록
Every September and October, entities in the palm oil and timber industries in Indonesia conduct slash-and-burn activities over peat land, causing transboundary ‘haze’ pollution. This paper analyzes the effectiveness of various legal solutions to tackle the transboundary haze pollution. There are mainly three forms of international law, customary international law, the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze 2002 and Singapore’s extraterritorial Transboundary Haze Pollution Act 2014. Their effectiveness will be measured by Indonesia’s increasing willingness to take domestic enforcement measures. This paper argues that the ASEAN Agreement is the primary instrument despite its lack of sanctions as it is neutral, non-confrontational and consistent with the ‘ASEAN way.’ The Singapore Act plays a complementary role, yet its invocation may strain relations between Singapore and Indonesia. Ultimately, the three forms of international law serve as a normative and facilitative source in nudging Indonesia to take more stringent domestic enforcement measures.참고 자료
없음태그
"Journal of East Asia and International Law"의 다른 논문
Today’s Ambalat: Neglecting the Basepoints of Sipadan a..14페이지
Han Kim and North Korean Accountability for Torture and..10페이지
“Settled Completely and Finally”: A Japanese Perspectiv..23페이지
Can Chinese Individuals Request the Restitution of Chin..18페이지
Article 2 of the Korea-Japan Basic Treaty and Japan’s R..21페이지
Dissolution of the Unified Progressive Party Case in Ko..17페이지
The Harmonization of Competition Laws towards the ASEAN..21페이지
The ASEAN Single Shipping Market: Towards a Regional Ca..26페이지
Enforcing a New National Security? China’s National Sec..25페이지
Brexit’s Challenge to Globalization and Implications fo..18페이지