朝鮮時代 實學者의 宦官制度 改革論
(주)학지사
- 최초 등록일
- 2015.03.25
- 최종 저작일
- 2005.01
- 25페이지/ 어도비 PDF
- 가격 5,400원
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 동국사학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 동국사학 / 41권
ㆍ저자명 : 張熙興
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 柳馨遠의 宦官論
Ⅲ. 李瀷의 宦官論
Ⅳ. 丁若鏞의 宦官論
Ⅴ. 宦官론의 性格
Ⅵ. 맺음말
[Abstract]
영어 초록
In the Course of weaken Royal power weakened at the late of Chosun Dynasty, The Shilhak-Scholars criticized the abnormal strengthening of vassal power, and claimed the reform of the State Council(議政府) and Six Ministries(六曹)system. They, however, insisted that the king should not monopolized official affairs with the vigorous sovereign power. Furthermore, they objected that eunuches who stood by king side intervened in state affairs. In this respect, it seems to me that both of bureaucrat's opinion and Shilhak-Scholar's opinion was similar to each other. That is, the both of them thought unsatisfactorily that eunuches set up Naesibu(內待府) and then had an independent government office. They, therefore, asserted the reduction of Naesibu(內待府)'s organization or its abolition. Politically they demanded varied measures in order to prohibit from eunuches taking part in state affairs in advance. They also maintain the ban on the eunuch's court official promotion, the limitation of their relays of the king's orders, the restriction of their official rank, the marriage prohibition, the dress classification, and so forth. They insisted that eunuches should not take part in the conducts of state affairs, and thought that it was a mistaken political course to relay the king' s order by eunuches itself. These arguments identified the bureaucrat's awareness of eunuch and the "Nee-Confucian literati"(士林)'s at the early of Chosun Dynasty with the bureaucrat's and the Shilhak-Scholar's at the late of Chosun Dynasty.
참고 자료
없음